2025 Annual Report
LinkedIn Intelligence · PE Sector · 2025

Which PE firms truly own LinkedIn?

A full-year analysis of 26 leading firms. Engagement, efficiency, follower growth, and the metrics that separate signal from noise.

26
Firms analyzed
5,265
Posts studied
223.1
Avg. Eng/Post benchmark
12 mo.
Analysis period
Key Highlights
Engagement Intensity #1
3.66×
Blackstone vs. sector avg of 1.0×
Fastest Follower Growth
+40.4%
Blue Owl Capital · 139K followers
Most Content Published
1,000
BlackRock · 176K total interactions
Best Audience Activation
40.2%
Hamilton Lane · 55K followers
Top Eng/Post (Sector)
817.6
Blackstone · 3.7× sector average
Total Interactions Analyzed
1.3M+
Across 5,265 posts and 26 firms
Methodology
1
Engagement Intensity Index
Normalized score comparing each firm's Eng/Post against the sector mean (223.1). A score of 1.0 equals average performance.
2
Activation Rate
Ratio of total interactions to follower count, annualized. Measures how well a firm converts passive followers into active engagers.
3
Share of Voice
A firm's total interactions as a percentage of all interactions across the 26-firm universe. Tracks relative dominance in the sector conversation.
Top 5 — Full Data
#FirmFollowersPostsEng/PostGrowthActivationIntensity
1
Blackstone
1,590,000 followers
1,590,000180817.6+23.4%9.2%
3.66×
2
Apollo
493,000 followers
493,000217445.4+24.2%19.6%
1.99×
3
Partners Group
168,000 followers
168,000169301.9+21.5%30.2%
1.35×
4
Sixth Street
91,000 followers
91,000105290.4+22.5%33.3%
1.30×
5
The Carlyle Group
522,000 followers
522,000225268.7+16.9%11.6%
1.20×
All 26 Firms — Preview
  • #FirmFollowersPostsEng/PostGrowth
  • 6
    Brookfield
    549K
    273
    258.6
    +11.7%
  • 7
    Ares Management
    310K
    364
    243.3
    +26.2%
  • 8
    Blue Owl Capital
    139K
    201
    232.1
    +40.4%
  • 9
    Vista Equity
    202K
    173
    229.8
    +14.1%
  • 10
    EQT Group
    234K
    240
    229.2
    +21.6%
  • 11
    KKR
    783K
    230
    228.1
    +21.4%
  • 12
    CVC
    301K
    187
    214.3
    +14.2%
  • 13
    Advent
    163K
    107
    208.3
    +15.2%
  • 14
    Oaktree Capital
    307K
    210
    194.5
    +17%
  • 15
    Warburg Pincus
    177K
    136
    193.5
    +17.4%
  • 16
    TPG
    283K
    222
    185.2
    +17.9%
  • 17
    Bain Capital
    403K
    174
    178.5
    +16.9%
  • 18
    BlackRock
    2.77M
    1,000
    176.5
    +24.7%
  • 19
    Thoma Bravo
    156K
    232
    170.4
    +20.5%
  • 20
    Ardian
    169K
    227
    141.2
    +21.4%
  • 21
    General Atlantic
    143K
    179
    133.9
    +17.6%
  • 22
    Bridgepoint
    74K
    137
    124.7
    +17.3%
  • 23
    Permira
    124K
    192
    123.7
    +16.6%
  • 24
    Insight Partners
    161K
    327
    105.6
    +16.9%
  • 25
    Golub Capital
    40K
    120
    61.9
    +20.1%
  • 26
    Hamilton Lane
    55K
    395
    56.4
    +22.8%
Performance Snapshot
Top 8 — Engagement per Post
Avg. interactions per post · Full year 2025
Full Access Includes
Complete Ranked Table
All 26 firms with full metrics. Sort by Eng/Post, Followers, Growth, Activation Rate, or Intensity Score. Export-ready data.
Interactive Efficiency Map
Scatter plot of posting volume vs. engagement quality. Instantly see who's working harder vs. smarter. Bubble size = audience reach.
Q/Q Trend Analysis
Quarterly evolution charts for 8 key firms. Track momentum, identify seasonal patterns, and spot firms accelerating or declining.

Unlock the full report — free

Enter your work email for instant access to all rankings, charts, standout analysis, and strategic insights.

No spam. No paywall. Just signal.

Disclaimer

The digital statistics and data presented in this report have been sourced exclusively from publicly available information, specifically from LinkedIn, and are not derived from any proprietary or confidential sources. This report has been prepared by Zinnia for educational and informational purposes only and should not be construed as professional advice or used as the basis for any business, legal, or financial decisions. While every reasonable effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of the information presented, the data may be subject to change, and Zinnia does not warrant the completeness or accuracy of any figures included herein. Zinnia assumes no liability for any errors, omissions, or inaccuracies in this report, and readers are encouraged to independently verify all information before drawing any conclusions.

© 2026 Zinnia Group. All rights reserved.